Ontological version of Hedblom et al. theory about Image Schemas, Spatial Primitives and their combinatorial logic expressed originally in DOL, here transposed in OWL2 via SWRL axioms and rules.
Hedblom module of ISAAC ontology: an ontology for Image Schemas Analysis And Comparison.
Designed by Stefano De Giorgis and Aldo Gangemi.
The relation for two or more Image Schema family intersection being the consequence of two or more Image Schemas intersection.
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
This property links some Concept or Event to its Image Schema Profile - namely to all the Spatial Schemas that are used in the conceptualizing process of that Concept or Event.
The type of combination of the Image Schema.
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
The relation from one Image Schema combining with another one.
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
This property expresses the climatic complexity of Image Schemas through the use of one or more Spatial Primitives. Some more basic Image Schemas use just one or few Spatial Primitives, while more complex Image Schemas are "fine tuning" for the more basic ones, since they are more specialised and articulated in their compositional structure and meaning.
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
The Image Schema Family to which a Spatial Schema pertains.
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
The name of the relation having as domain an Image Schema Family and as range a Spatial Schema or a FundamentalSpatialBuildingBlocks (Spatial Primitive).
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
The relation from the Image Schema being the result of a Collection combination.
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
The relation for the Static or Dynamic form of an Image Schema.
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
The relation from the Image Schema being the result of a Merge combination.
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
The relation from the Image Schema being the result of a Sequence/Structured combination.
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
Some Image Schemas are the result of the intersection of other Image Schemas. e.g. GOING_IN is the result of SOURCE_PATH_GOAL and CONTAINMENT.
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
The relation between two Image Schemas, one being the Dynamic form for the other.
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
The relation between two Image Schemas, one being the Static form for the other.
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 201
The relation from one Image Schema and a Spatial Primitive (Fundamental Spatial Building Block).
This property states that one Image Schema inherits the "type of movement" e.g. in CYCLE, straight to a goal as in PATH_TO_GOAL etc. from another Image Schema.
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
Some concepts can be conceptualized as built from a collection of Image Schemas, this collection is called "Profile".
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
This property states that one Image Schema inherits the "spatial organization" e.g. in CENTER_PERIPHERY from another Image Schema.
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
"The mentioned examples lead to primarily three different ways in which image schemas can be combined"
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
"While these forms of combinations capture some of the most apparent combinations of image schemas, they are by no means intended to be exhaustive. Other combinations, or even combinations of these combinations, are possible to exist"
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
The level of complexity of an Image Schema. The IS_Complexity increases directly proportionally to the increasing number of Spatial Primitives used. Here it is expressed with the property fineTuningFor.
(Hedblom et al. 2015: 23)
"similar image schemas can be grouped together into ‘families’ represented as graphs of theories with increasing complexity."
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
Image schemas consist of different “parts”; “These ‘parts’ can either be removed or added while still capturing the same basic image schema, generating what can be described as an imageschema ‘family’.” (Hedblom et al. 2015: 23)
The Static or Dynamic Form of a Spatial Schema.
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
"groupings of image schemas that capture the spatiotemporal relationships related to particular events."
(Todd Oakley. Image schema. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pages 214–235. Oxford University Press, 2010.)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
"Image schemas can be combined with one another in many different ways."
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
Spatial Primitives, sometimes called "Foundamental Spatial Building Blocks" for their having origin in spatial perception and being the most elementary building blocks in the compositional approach to Spatial Schemas.
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
"Image schemas represent the abstract generalisations learned from the sensorimotor processes. They are conceptual gestalts, meaning that each part is essential for the whole meaning of the image schema, and most often they are described as capturing sensorimotor relationships and their transformations."
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
"Image schemas, on the other hand, are spatiotemporal relationships used in cognitive science as building blocks to conceptualise objects and events on a high level of abstraction."
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
The image schema family grouping image schemas about "Containment".
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
"A collection of image schemas do not, per se, alter the Gestalt properties of a particular spatiotemporal relationship, but instead functions as a joint representation for a particular concept."
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
"Occurs when two image schemas are combined in such a way that the Gestalt laws are altered."
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
The image schema family grouping image schemas about "Path".
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
"This represents the image-schematic conceptualisations that behave much like collection, only with the addition of a sequential ‘cause-and-effect’ dimension. In many cases, this takes a linear form but there are situations with branching routes or circular patterns."
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
"In static form, the image schema denotes the notion that objects can be inside other objects."
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
Same individual as Sequence, only renamed.
(Hedblom et al. 2015)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
The group of image schemas activated when conceptualizing the (making a) Turducken Action.
(Maria M. Hedblom, Dagmar Gromann, and Oliver Kutz. 2018.)
(Hedblom, M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019)
(Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizzardi, G. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events.)
The group of image schemas activated when concetpualizing the going_to_the_supermarket Event.
true
S8
true
S1
true
S5
true
S7
true
S3
true
S2
true
S4
true
S6