ISAAC network module of comparison among Image Schemas Theories using the intensional epistemological vocabulary of Exuviae module, from COntPare methodology.
Version 1.0: 29-04-2021 includes Hedblom module, Johnson1987 module and MPC module + Exuviae module + DUL + Framester alignments.
Designed by Stefano De Giorgis and Aldo Gangemi.
1.1 Added class alignments to DUL
The collection of conceptual fragments about the Concept of "Image Schema Combinations" in different theories.
e.g. ways of combining Image Schemas among them, ways of combining Image Schemas with Spatial Primitives, ways of combining Image Schemas with non spatial concepts etc.
The collection of conceptual fragments about the Concept of "Image Schema Components" in different theories.
e.g. "components", "spatial primitives", foundamental spatial building blocks" etc.
true
The collection of conceptual fragments about the Concept of "Image Schema Grouping" in different theories.
e.g. grouping according to a semantic field, grouping according to activation from lexical material, grouping for complexity degree etc.
The collection of conceptual fragments about the Concept of "Image Schema Quality" in different theories.
e.g. the Static vs Dynamic Form, the complexity etc.
Image Schema notions are often blurred, overlapping in their extensionality with the Spatial Primitive class, not formalized and not clarified in their way of combining with themselves, spatial primitives or other non-sensorimotor material.
This class, without claiming to have all the answers, represents ways to evaluate modifications to those entities, in the epistemic debate process trying to clarify all the aspects above mentioned.
true
true
The Epistemological comparison applied to Image Schema theories. This class takes as instances the Comparison of different Fragments grouped for their semantic field.
e.g. all the fragments related to the notion of Image Schemas in compared theories, or all the fragments related to the ways of grouping image schemas in different theories.
true
true
The collection of Fragments from Image Schema Theories.
The collection of conceptual fragments about the Concept of "Image Schema" in different theories.
Some Entity is reframed with the addition of some conceptual aspect related to Embodied Cognition Theory.
While being an instance of the Class comparing Image Schema Theory Fragments, this Entity refers to those fragments being unique, e.g. entities introduced only in one theory and not strictly comparable with other fragments of the same or other theories. For this reason more than a "comparison" it is an evaluation of those "hapax legomenon" concpetual entities. The reason to derive an Hapax Legomenon Entity could be that it allows formal improvements, theoretical clarification, conceptual bridging toward different theories etc.
The Grouping of Image Schemas could be done based on their activation from some linguistic material.
The epistemological comparison about different notions of "Image Schema Components" in different theories.
The Usage that the "Image Schema components" class have in the ontological version of some Theory.
The Usage that the "ImageSchema" class have in the ontological version of some Theory.
Some Fragment of a theory is particularly important to that theory.
The epistemological comparison about different notions of "Image Schema" in different theories.
The Grouping of Spatial Primitives could be done based on their activation from some linguistic material.
Aldo Gangemi
2021-05-06T15:50:25Z
true
S7